Plus, can Congress limit the pardon power? |

From the legal reporting team at Deadline: White House with Nicolle Wallace

In this edition: The Supreme Court wraps up its first session; the Department of Government Efficiency gets a shot at a win; Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch team up; election denier John Eastman gets some good news on his law license and more. 

 

Jordan Rubin: Eastman in the Bardo

Jordan Rubin: Eastman in the Bardo

Welcome back, Deadline: Legal newsletter readers. The Supreme Court wrapped up its first two-week hearing session of the term, while adding a DOGE-related case to the docket, handing the GOP another emergency win ahead of the midterms, and giving John Eastman a spark of hope for his law license.

The DOGE grant appeared on Tuesday’s order list announcing the latest action on pending petitions. Among the new cases the justices agreed to decide this term was the Trump administration’s plea for help against a watchdog group that has been fighting for information about the Elon Musk-backed Department of Government Efficiency.

In a previous round of DOGE litigation, the high court’s Republican-appointed majority ordered the lower courts to narrow discovery into the purported efficiency initiative. The administration is hoping to prevail again in its latest fight for secrecy.

The order list also produced a notable pairing in Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch. The two have joined forces before to call out what they’ve seen as government abuses, even when their colleagues have stayed silent. That happened again Tuesday, when the Obama appointee issued a statement lamenting the “constitutional absurdity” of Jesus Herrera-Salazar’s double prosecution.

He had served time for being “found in” the U.S. after his removal and was told to stay in Oklahoma while on supervised release. But abiding by that instruction led to him being charged again for the same crime of being “found in” the country he was told to stay in. Joined by the Trump appointee, who has shown a libertarian streak in some cases, Sotomayor said that courts faced with this situation in the future should “avoid the constitutional absurdity that occurred here and give the Double Jeopardy Clause its full weight and meaning.”

Read the rest of my roundup here.

Have any questions or comments for me? I’d love to hear from you! Please submit them through this form for a chance to be featured in a future newsletter.

Ask Jordan

Alternate text

“I know the President has the power to pardon, but can Congress pass a law that says a person must be convicted before they can be pardoned? Or a law that says they must apply for a pardon stating what criminal activity they engaged in before the President can use the pardon power, so everyone knows what crime(s) they committed?” 

– Bec J

Hi Bec,

I think the answer to both questions is “no.”

The pardon power is a vast constitutional authority belonging to the president.

To be sure, the power has limits. It applies to federal, not state, crimes. It applies to those offenses only after they occur; pardons aren’t permission slips to commit crimes in the future. Presidents also can’t pardon impeachments, so that is one area that the Constitution has carved out for Congress.

Beyond that, the Supreme Court has called the power “unlimited,” writing in an 1866 case that it “extends to every offence known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken, or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.”

Read the rest of Jordan’s answer here.

Pop Quiz

Alternate text

Which NFL team did a legendary Supreme Court lawyer subtly trash talk at a hearing this week?

Scroll down for the answer.

A. Green Bay Packers

B. Chicago Bears

C. New York Giants

D. Miami Dolphins

Scroll down for the answer.

Top Stories

Alternate text
Zacharia

JAKE TRAYLOR AND HAYLEY MEISSNER

Katie Zacharia is out as White House press secretary after just 5 days

She departed her post amid questions about whether she was actually a lawyer, as she had claimed. Read more.

Patel

STEVE BENEN

FBI agents fired for working on Trump’s classified documents case file new lawsuit

“This lawsuit will prove their unlawful dismissal and hold the administration accountable,” the former agents’ attorneys said. Read more.

Capitol Police

JACK FITZPATRICK, CASEY GANNON AND SYDNEY CARRUTH

Law enforcement investigating suspicious letters sent to Congress, elections offices

Federal authorities are probing the source of envelopes with “suspicious substances” that were mailed to congressional and elections offices. Read more.

Voting

JOHN PFAFF

Trump can’t swarm polling sites with federal officers even if he wants to

However much the president might like to swarm polling places with federal officers, he simply doesn’t have enough at his disposal. Read more.

Kushner

DONALD K. SHERMAN

Jared Kushner has no right to be playing diplomat

If the president’s son-in-law wants to have authority over U.S. foreign policy, he must face Congress. That’s why we’re suing to demand it. Read more.

Trump

JORDAN RUBIN

Appeals court allows Trump to further delay hearing on Jack Smith’s documents report

The president’s counsel cited Trump’s busy schedule ahead of the November midterm elections. Read more.

Quiz answer: Chicago Bears. During Wednesday’s hearing in Salazar v. Paramount Global, the company’s lawyer Paul Clement said, “I don't know, maybe, like, watching, you know, Chicago Bears films is embarrassing in certain parts of the country.” The veteran attorney, who argued against liability for the company in a dispute over a privacy law, is a Wisconsin native and fan of the rival Green Bay Packers.

 

Did a friend forward you this newsletter? Sign up here

 

229 West 43rd St.
New York, NY 10036

UNSUBSCRIBE | PRIVACY | CONTACT | VIEW IN BROWSER

UNSUBSCRIBE | PRIVACY | CONTACT | VIEW IN BROWSER